Expect harsh intensive scrutiny if HCFA audits Medicare claims
By Paula E. Hartman-Stein, Ph.D.
Operation Restore Trust, the anti-fraud and abuse program operated by the Office of the Inspector General, has placed psychologists are under harsh scrutiny, contending it is warranted by a history of Medicare claims that contained billing errors.
The information emanates from James Georgoulakis, Ph.D., who is APA representative to the Health Care Finance Administration's (HCFA) Relative Update Committee.
"Psychologists and psychiatrists will not only continue to be audited but will be subjected to even greater scrutiny," according to Georgoulakis. The type and focus of the audits vary from region to region because the Medicare carriers have discretion in mental health reimbursement policy. HCFA is mandating that all carriers insure that the Medicare system not be exposed to fraud and abuse by providers.
Beginning Oct. 1, HCFA reports it will intensify its review of partial hospitalization claim forms. Georgoulakis said that the Office of Inspector General reviewed a sample of programs in five states (Florida, Texas, Colorado, Pennsylvania, and Alabama) and found that over 90% of Community Mental Health Center partial hospitalization claims contained billing errors which violated Medicare rules. HCFA described the findings as an "emergency situation" and stated that providers in these five states posed a significant risk to the integrity of the Medicare program.
The types of mental health audits currently under way across the country range from pre-payment denials pending documentation that demonstrates medical necessity to post-payment audits in which the provider must often return large sums based on estimates of overpayment. One audit process, known as Focused Medical Review, analyzes statistical data compiled from processed claims and compares the utilization patterns of individual practitioners with regional trends.
In recipient-centered audits, frequently conducted on patients in nursing homes, an individual client's entire chart may be reviewed for the necessity of all services provided under Part B, Medicare. In such cases the mental health provider's records are only one piece of the entire review.
Alice Randolph, Ph.D., chair of the Ohio Psychology Association's State and Federal Committee said that sweeping audits' of psychology services are currently underway in Ohio. The clinical areas targeted appear to be psychotherapy services administered to patients with dementia diagnoses, psychotherapy services billed to hospital in-patients, and neuropsychology services provided to patients in any setting.
Randolph said she has chaired meetings with the representatives from the local carrier for three years, and the outcomes of these meetings have been productive. "However, in the current milieu the provider is seen as such a scapegoat," she said. Her committee has asked for specific reasons for every service that has been denied. Randolph believes that the carriers "need to be accountable to a decision-making process that is congruent with stated public policy." Randolph says that even though there is an appeals process open to psychologists who are denied payment or who are mandated to return money, she fears that the process will discourage conscientious, competent psychologists from providing care to frail older adults. Randolph explained: "Very few psychologists will risk this exposure in the future, with an extremely widespread negative consequence to the consumer."
Robert Rome, Ph.D. the California Psychology Association representative for Medicare, has similar concerns. Practitioners who attempt to provide services to patients with developmental disabilities or chronic mental illness may be denied payment without providing extensive documentation as to the need for treatment, he said, with the net result that "appropriate care is not always provided." He criticized the carriers for not providing clearcut guidelines for what is deemed appropriate treatment, noting that this may be an opportunity for psychologists to determine what are "best practices" in older adult care. Georgoulakis believes that HCFA will not dictate the scope of clinical practice. He said that practice standards are internal professional issues that will be left to each individual carrier to enforce.
Joe Casciani, Ph.D. a LaJolla California psychologist who operates a large multi-state nursing home practice, acknowledges that psychologists must demonstrate how their services benefit the dementing patient. "The onus is on us to prove that the patient is still capable of participating and benefiting from treatment," said Casciani. "I think our profession has a long way to go to show how and why these services will help dementing patients, since the presumption from the medical community and consumers is that we can't.
Results of past Medicare audits point to the fact that psychologists are much be better informed about how to properly document their work. Question: are much better informed than who? Georgoulakis says that most clinicians do a reasonably good job of communicating diagnosis and procedures to other professionals, but documenting for billing purposes is different since most billing reviews are not done by mental health professionals.
Randolph urges psychologists to read HCFA's policies that are sent to practitioners in newsletters from the carriers. One example she cited is the need to demonstrate treatment goals and progress of individual clients when conducting group therapy, so that the clinical service can be distinguished from socialization groups, a service not covered under Medicare.
Why audits are conducted?
According to Georgoulakis, common triggers for audits include the following: use of a code that provides a higher reimbursement rate when documentation supports a lower level of code; use of the same time for testing across all patients, showing a high percentage of the same code (e.g., only billing for initial evaluations); excessive visits to nursing home patients; outpatient billing within 72 hours of hospital discharge; and excessive testing hours on a single day.
Another red flag is when the procedure code and the diagnosis do not match. For example, if psychological testing is conducted and the resulting diagnosis is a neurological one, the clinician should list a diagnosis from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). Similarly the procedure code in this case should reflect neuropsychological testing (either CPT codes 96115 or 96117) rather than the testing code 96100, that should be used with psychiatric diagnoses.
In documenting clinical services the record must be complete and legible with a reason for the services clearly listed. The assessment, impression, and diagnosis as well as plan of care must be stated clearly along with progress made as a result of treatment.
Audits are arduous, time-consuming
According to a reliable, anonymous source whose practice has been subjected to several audits, the review process can be arduous and time-consuming, but the auditors were reasonable and cooperative. Treating the auditors respectfully and giving full cooperation was essential for a good outcome. Randolph said that some psychologists have not kept separate charts on their nursing home patients, relying on the facilities to keep the records available. This has been problematic when audits can request information on patient services delivered up to five years ago.
The worst case scenario is that an audit demonstrates fraudulent practice. A provider in any healthcare benefit program is subject under the federal sentencing guidelines to both civil and criminal prosecution. The psychologist can then receive not only a civil fine but also jail time, according to Georgoulakis.
Paula Hartman-Stein, Ph.D. is a clinical psychologist and consultant at the Center for Healthy Aging in Akron, Ohio. She edited Innovative Behavioral Healthcare for Older Adults: A Guidebook for Changing Times (1998). She can be reached through the Internet at www.centerforhealthyaging.com.
Letter from Uncle Sam: Brother, you owe $ 1,600,000
Here is hoping that you havent received a bill from the government lately asserting you owe $1,600,000.
Somewhere in Ohio, there appears to be a yet-unknown psychologist who is scratching his/her head asking what and how this could happen. Another is said to owe $920,608.89.
It has to do with those wretched Medicare audits and billings not covered by Medicare policies. The overpayments are said to range from $44,000 to $1,600,000.
"We have reason to believe that all psychologists/services working with nursing homes are being audited and will receive similar letters," said Michael Ranney, executive director of the Ohio Psychological Assn. He was critical of Medicare, asserting that the state association had been working closely with Medicare for over three years, and he described past communication as "excellent."
"The fraud audit," Ranney said, "comes out of the blue." He contended that Medicare auditors "have not participated in the policy discussions we have had, and the letters people have received misrepresent the policies we have discussed."
This crisis appears to be over a concept called "extrapolation." Ranney explained:
"One of our members had 3,217 cases over the four years covered by the audit. Medicare auditors take a 10% sample which total 321 cases. They break it down by selecting 48 cases to be reviewed. They found the average overpayment among the 48 cases was $286.17. Medicare then multiplies that $286.17 by the 3,217 cases to calculate the net overpayment. It totals $920,608.89" ....additional story contribution by Henry Saeman, editor of the National Psychologist.